Right amount of motivation and practice can train better than classroom training. What is your opinion? Provide relevant examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of training by adequate motivation or practice and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of attending in the classroom is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that studying of rational motivation for training can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, strong motivation can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of frequent practice, as well as devoted effort, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of incentive on cognitive skills and theoretical knowledge. Thus, beneficial ramification of both abundant talent and stimulating idea apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of continues practice, enough motivation might increase the consequence of intellectual ability. Moreover, fundamental aspects of hardworking endlessly would relate to this reality that the demerits of lack of teamwork ability pertain to lack of social relationship. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of studying vigorously without attending in the classroom is correlated negatively with failing in the exam. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of having the source of inspiration.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of adequate motivation and constant practice outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of mental simulation prove the significance of performing well in the exam, but also pinpoint practical implications.
- Personal Development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 49
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? . 78
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? . 11
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 84
- The environment we live in is in danger. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this? 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71929824561 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2460483351 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638596491228 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2597933678 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.833333333 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145007190615 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457646556077 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390049673893 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800543827626 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399065495596 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.