Some effective people like repetitive routine such as eating the same food do you like this way Discuss your views

Every people in the world have a special routine just for them to do things. One of the most common trend now seen in light is the repetitive routine of effective people such as eating the same food, at the same time, and so on. I personally disagree with this praxis and I will discuss my views in the following paragraphs.

To commence, there are a myriad of reason why I think a person should not follow this custom. The most preponderant one is that one should experience every aspect of joy in his life. We cannot move forward with our life if we are stuck at a position. For example, a person trying new things in his life will have a better understanding of themselves. One can never find the full meaning of life, but doing this one can categories his or her personal likes and can have a feeling of contentment in life.

Another overt facet of this thought is that, most people who are following the same routine day after day is because they are scared of changes. The decision making process, the implementation and to let of go of things of the past terrifies them. We have to overcome this fear to move forward life. One cannot gain anything just by sitting in the safe zone. Following a routine is not a bad thing, but one should allow himself to explore things.

From what has been discussed above, one can conclude that following the same routine day after day will not help us move forward in life. One should be ready to tackle anything that life throws at us.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...paragraphs. To commence, there are a myriad of reason why I think a person should n...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, for example, i think, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45054945055 5.00649968141 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39494899796 2.71678728327 88% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534798534799 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 390.6 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7328581092 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 104.977214359 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 7.25397266985 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191336503145 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601282362405 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733471168245 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133727719205 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114130164097 0.0609392437508 187% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 12.6369458128 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.1260098522 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.9458128079 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.5310837438 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.32886699507 85% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 55.0591133005 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.