In this day and age, integrating employees in the decision-making process of their goods and services has become a debatable issue among people from all walks of life all around the world. Although, decision-making process that involves employees regarded as thoroughly both positive and constructive by many individuals, there are a number of people hold an opposite view. My opinion is to strongly believe that associating workers in critical choices is quite beneficial for nations since it results in better engagement within the organisation.
To begin with, there are a number of reasons why I support the idea of considering the opinion of employees in the decision-making process. First and foremost is that it results in better decisions. Secondly, it causes improved productivity. From my personal experience, implementation of such practices in my organisation it resulted in better engagement within the organisation. Consequently, it is quite conspicuous that associating workers in critical choices is a good thing.
However, there is no doubt that the decision-making process that involves employees can produce various negative outcomes. Despite this possibility, it is highly claimed that naive decisions can slow down the growth of a company. By way of example, recent academic research conducted by Oxford University researchers in 2012 has shown that such decisions are less feasible economically. Thus, it is quite obvious that the decision-making process that involves employees can be negative too.
To put it in a nutshell, while there are several persuasive arguments on both sides, my opinion depicts that the integration of employees in the decision-making process of their goods and services is beneficial for the employers. Not only due to better decisions but also due to improved productivity.
- Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies? 77
- Cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and lesspeople use cash. How realistic do you think it is and what do you see in its potential benefits or problems? 77
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 73
- Travel to study is over rated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies? 72
- Some organisations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3444974608 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521428571429 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7409165843 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322128706061 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103854784545 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927176577572 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201068171971 0.151781067708 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043240165815 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.