Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work, some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases.
Recently the phenomenon of concentrating on the study and work and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of broadening experiences are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that designed activities can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, studying and working can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of young people, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of practical experiences. Hence, beneficial ramifications of international travels are visible.
From a scientific point of view, expanding experiences can provide the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of inefficient activities are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described costly experiences. Thus, predicted outcomes of volunteering are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of concentrating on the work and study far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of experienced young people prove the significance of efficient activities, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 222.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83333333333 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39214013903 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657657657658 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8972853362 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.727272727 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193274529977 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558674507948 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279592447987 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961885814462 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234408989183 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.1 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.