Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it?
There are a great number of people who interpret the impacts of imposing laws as thoroughly constructive and positive, while there are a number of people who hold an opponent’s view. I am inclined to believe law can positively shape people’s perception and behavior.
There are several reasons why imposing law is advantageous. First of all, it is argued that the fear of being penalized plays a pivotal role in the way people behave. This may be attributed to the fact that as a result of possible penalties, people will be compelled to constantly remind themselves about the harmful consequences of breaking the law, so that they will become more responsible and accountable for their actions. For example, the law of defamation is highly regarded as a fundamental protection of reputation for individuals and organizations.
In addition, it is claimed that law could enormously and constructively shape our perception. This is to say that legislation inevitably leads people to think the consequences of their actions in a more detailed and focused way, therefore, it would specialize the characteristics in people, which might stimulate them to acquire positive outcome in their social and personal life. For example, Malaysia has introduced a higher tax on alcoholic beverages, which has consequently led to a significant decrease in consumption of these beverages. As these examples illustrate, the benefit of imposing law is obvious, and our behavior and perception could be positively changed.
In a nutshell, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that law is essential for both individuals and organizations, and can change human behavior. It is recommended that the authorities should introduce the regulated laws in order to not restrict human rights and freedom.
- There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it? 77
- In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. 77
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 88
- Actions speak louder than words. What is your opinion? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4128113879 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28317997972 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576512455516 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0474186011 50.4703680194 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.75 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216641243523 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826734797369 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620428607073 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139490851483 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582340367232 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.