Recently, the phenomenon of teaching children at home is best for child development and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I highly believe that being important for children to go to school can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the comparing between important for children to go to school or teaching children at home can provide the society with noticeable effects that are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as ultimate outcomes, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
From a scientific point of view, teaching children at home might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of developing children by teaching them at home far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59362549801 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22065661099 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621513944223 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0956605046 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.636363636 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351317779197 0.242375264174 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113896983309 0.0925447433944 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108206681472 0.071462118173 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195073335553 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704634593388 0.0609392437508 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.