Recently, the phenomenon of increasing new inventions and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a new invention of the technological world can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, increasing new inventions can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered current policies. Thus,
beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, an increasing number of new inventions might increase the consequences of critical
needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this
remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of a new invention description far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...iduals. I am inclined to believe that a new invention of the technological world can be a plu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...ofoundly believe that the benefits of a new invention description far outweigh its drawbacks....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73279352227 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34359525586 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651821862348 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7438079865 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.727272727 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.12807881773 170% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286361561043 0.242375264174 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101574940249 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959954415724 0.071462118173 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115720825018 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102746950577 0.0609392437508 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.