Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, there has been a drastic rise in the number of high schools that make unpaid community service mandatory along with academic curriculum. While most believe that this is a positive initiative that allow high school children to grow into responsible citizens, others oppose this idea. This essay will discuss both sides and provide reasons why community service is beneficial for their overall development.
To begin with, one strong argument against promoting social service programmes undertaken by school kids is that it distracts them from concentrating on academics. Since the world we live in is a competitive world, parents are of the opinion that children should devote maximum time to excel in academics. For example, most high school children attend coaching classes for several competitive examinations immediately after school. Consequently, they have little time to afford for other recreational or community programmes. Thus, most children are dissuaded from being part of such initiatives.
However, there are several arguments in favour of children taking active part in community service. This allows children to develop a broader perspective in life and a sense of giving back to society. Cleaning of the streets, for instance, ensure that they develop an attitude where they avoid throwing garbage on streets. Another advantage is that it provides them with an opportunity to interact with like minded children and external people as part of this programme. In addition, it helps them in developing their social and interpersonal skills.
To conclude, despite some disadvantages, community service rendered by high school children help them develop into responsible and mature individuals. In my opinion, such programmes are beneficial for children as it greatly enhances their social outlook and perspective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mikeboss268 | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | richierich25 | 85 | view |
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Many people think that the place you were born affects your success in later life. What is your opinion about the relevance of one’s place of birth upon future success? 88
- It is important that maintain and protect the beautiful building in the past even if it is expensive for owners to do so what do you think of this statement Give reasons and examples on your own experience 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, look, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61565836299 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87553292561 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601423487544 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5280866672 50.4703680194 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.2 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 6.9802955665 186% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260918551249 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850205024187 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464418031718 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164169818404 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419904455554 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.