Some people only have pets to not feel lonely, for example, but they don’t always take proper care of them. Do you think people who don’t always take proper care of their pets should be allowed to keep them?

These days, there is an ongoing debate between people about pets, some people only have pets to not feel lonely, and if it should be viewed as a positive or negative impact to the pets. While it is possible to claim that pets provides safety and relaxation to people! My view is that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analysing both sides of the argument.

There are several reasons why those people should not allowed to keep pets. One of them is that not taking proper care of pet is equivalent to mistreating it, which is cruel. It can also be argued that pets should be treated in moral and ethical way. Some owners put their pet into cages, so they do not get their freedom. It should also taken into account that new born puppies are separated from their parents, so they do not get the love from their parent. Vaccination is not done at correct time, so they suffer from different diseases. For example, if a person buys parrot just only for his entertainment, and he does not pay attention to his food requirement. This has let to the pets becoming more lonely and weak.

First of all, It is owner's responsibility to feed their pets regularly, and they should spend time with their pets. Some pets needs a lot of space to live these types of pets are not suitable for some people who lives in tiny place.

In conclusion, while there are strong arguments on the both sides of the case, my opinion is that people who do not take care of their pets should not be allowed to keep pets. I would strongly recommend that government should take necessary steps against this issue.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'allow'
Suggestion: allow
...ral reasons why those people should not allowed to keep pets. One of them is that not t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'need'.
Suggestion: need
...d spend time with their pets. Some pets needs a lot of space to live these types of p...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 20.9802955665 186% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53691275168 5.00649968141 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36337876969 2.71678728327 87% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553691275168 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0210750789 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1333333333 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397887629416 0.242375264174 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122690722068 0.0925447433944 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825538321265 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233349089632 0.151781067708 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047339716474 0.0609392437508 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 12.6369458128 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.1260098522 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.9458128079 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.5310837438 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.32886699507 86% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 55.0591133005 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.