Some people suggest that each family should only have one car and encourage alternative vehicle. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
An alternative conveyance and a single dedicated vehicle for each family in necessary now a days. Critics suggests in same way but stress for only one single car in the perspectives like polluted environment due to the exceeding amount of cars and i am also fully agreed with this statement.
Firstly, in rapid pace of life and due to numerous necessities, each family member avails a dedicated car in a home. It is helpful for daily usage which counts for official use, children pick and drop facility at schools or collages or required for shopping etc. On other hand, some times an alternative conveyance also become so useful in case of actual vehicle is dedicate for some specific purpose.
Further more, due to these huge number of vehicle if we consider average 2 vehicles almost in each family then it would not be wrong. Now a days every single person is using a dedicated car and trend of using public transport is getting low. Number of reasons are behind this issue like the level of lifestyle changes in people to use their own car instead get dependent on public buses or trains. Further impact of poor developments in government sectors and due to this bad governance, people avoid the hassle of traveling through public transport.
In addition, government must take special initiatives to make developments and enhancement in public transports in shape of mass transit systems to facilitate people maximum, so they could be less dependent on their own dedicated cars. Otherwise increasing amount of personal vehicles will also create the problems of pollution in environment.
In conclusion, people should encourage alternative vehicle like using public transports and must strict themselves to use a single vehicle for family usage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-20 | ajayvermaETP | 62 | view |
| 2018-05-27 | ajayvermaETP | 92 | view |
| 2018-05-26 | ajayvermaETP | 55 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...ed vehicle for each family in necessary now a days. Critics suggests in same way but stres...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...ehicle for each family in necessary now a days. Critics suggests in same way but stres...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...due to the exceeding amount of cars and i am also fully agreed with this statemen...
^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e so useful in case of actual vehicle is dedicate for some specific purpose. F...
^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'dedicated'.
Suggestion: dedicated
...so useful in case of actual vehicle is dedicate for some specific purpose. Further m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
...each family then it would not be wrong. Now a days every single person is using a dedicate...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
... family then it would not be wrong. Now a days every single person is using a dedicate...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
... dependent on their own dedicated cars. Otherwise increasing amount of personal vehicles ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08996539792 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7537340048 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59169550173 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5110169002 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.583333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171287548939 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065105920213 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503251099625 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103021653922 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582575125826 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.