Some people think that it is better for children to learn a foreign language at primary school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of learning a various language in childhood and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of playing in primary school instead is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning Language in early ages can be a plus and I will discuss that throughout this essay.

From the conversational standpoint, can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that better job opportunity as well as broadening the skills are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic examination which discovered being bilingual improve the cognitive skills, especially in childhood. Thus, the beneficial consequences of cognitive and linguistic skills apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of education, Language in school curriculum might exacerbate the consequences of growth. Moreover, the fundamental aspects related to this reality the demerit of early age learning language pertain to being a jack-in-all-trades and losing their specific goal. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted the downsides of learning a different language is correlated negatively with being confused. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceive the notion of broadening their horizons.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of picking a language in primary school far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of international language prove the significance of widely used around the world, but also pinpoint future career implications.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nfused. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceive the notion of broadening their horizons...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68231046931 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29417981277 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631768953069 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8133252285 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.166666667 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154353178737 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503417115952 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309340552576 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875559147436 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331189683875 0.0609392437508 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.