Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options.
Recently, the phenomenon of keeping pets and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that good approach can be a plus, and I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, Keeping pets can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common trend and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, unhealthy pets might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the faulty systems would relate to this reality that the demerits of n pertain to n. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by the prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it's correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of keeping pets for children far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes but also social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-13 | Krishn Patel | 88 | view |
| 2018-11-13 | Krishn Patel | 85 | view |
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- More information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree? 88
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. agree or disagree? 77
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- If you are assigned to work on a study on climate change, what will you choose to focus on and why? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58039215686 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15829708007 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654901960784 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3450396235 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.583333333 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171868616343 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510133089987 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473259054175 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096914564365 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370081593836 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.