Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently the fundamental essence of theoretical courses in universities and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of vocational schools is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that practical training can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, providing theoretical knowledge in universities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that, having the related skill, as well as being prepared for the labor market. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the effects of working and studying. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both experiencing and being knowledgable apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of educational issues, practical knowledge in university might increase the consequences of having work experience. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the theories relate to this reality that the demerits of working failures pertain to lack of working experience. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of acquiring knowledge are correlated negatively with lack of self-confidence at work. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of practical training.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of vocational training in universities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of acquiring knowledge prove the significance of some theoretical studying, but also pinpoint the implications of the experimental course.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | maryam2 | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-18 | MehdiKhodadadi | 88 | view |
| 2018-12-12 | arami | 88 | view |
| 2018-11-07 | Krishn Patel | 85 | view |
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 85
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s acts. what is your opinion? 88
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Does video communication with the doctor help patient to cure any disease? pros and cons? 87
- Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Which do you prefer use specific reason to develop your essay. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80952380952 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3326288351 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611721611722 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.906070828 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.166666667 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20024479995 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067077829586 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450107178249 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112319017496 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00719031416787 0.0609392437508 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.