Some people think women should be given equal chances to work and excel in their careers. Other believes that a women’s role should be limited to taking care of the house and children’s. Which opinion do you agree with and why?
The implication of women should be given equal chances to work, but other think that women’s role should be limited to taking care of the house and children’s, which is fairly debatable has now gained further attention from numerous arenas. The sizeable influence of this subject has generated controversy over the potential impact of this trend. I agree with the statement and the related reason as following and this will be further discussed before reaching logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are diverse reasons why this subject is considered as vital, but the most conspicuous one stems from the facts that women’s now day’s working in so many fields like doctor’s, pilot’s and in many other fields. In foreign countries women’s do work with men’s because women’s get equal rights.
In addition, women’s nowadays more educated than men’s and women’s want to do jobs as well as men’s. Initially, also encourage the international trade. Furthermore, it can be effective tool.
The importance of women should be given equal chances to work and excel in their careers, but other believes that women’s role should be limited to taking care of the house can be debated, but the fact remains that there were several factors that lead to this theme and matter. Eventually, according to the above analysis, it can be concluded that women’s want to do work and it is necessary for women’s it can be predicted that in the near future.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-01 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
- Experience is more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or Disagree. 80
- Impact of television shows on society? 55
- Medical technology is responsible for an increase in human’s life expectancy. Is it a boon or a curse for the mankind? 80
- In some countries, the no of shooting increase because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 55
- Mobile phones 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... predicted that in the near future.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35269709544 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04078326063 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55601659751 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.7301046127 50.4703680194 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.596951079798 0.242375264174 246% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.228045309641 0.0925447433944 246% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.19601625208 0.071462118173 274% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.369867606169 0.151781067708 244% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11993114275 0.0609392437508 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.