Some point that experiential learning ( ie. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others thinks a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning can work well in high schools or colleges?
The effect of experiential learning in formal education, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of experiential learning in high schools or colleges has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the whole student groups in recent years. It can be agreed that experiential learning can work well in high schools, though it has drawbacks. This essay will elaborate on how experiential learning enhances the competitiveness of students in the future and how experiential learning is a time-consuming problem for students, thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerable reasons that experiential learning can work well in high schools and colleges, but the most conspicuous stems for the fact is that experiential learning can enhance the competitiveness of students in the future job hunting. As an illustration, the research has revealed that China’s graduation employment rate in 2018 has dramatically increased six times compared with 2017 after experiential learning was introduced in thirty colleges. Therefore, experiential learning can bring some benefits to colleges.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that experiential learning can take negative impact to high schools as there are innumerable reasons but the most salient one for that is experiential learning cost too much study time on students. For instance, John’s examination grade has decreased twenty points after he attended three different experiential learnings which means he needs to spend nine hours on it only just one day. Thus, experiential learning takes a negative influence on students.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of experiential learning is prominent, although time-consuming problems should be well handled.
- The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is the problem? What problem will this shortage of time cause? 55
- The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life How widespread is the problem What problem will this shortage of time cause 81
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this? Do you think this is a good or bad change? 80
- Some universities deduct students’ work if assignment is given late. What is your opinion and suggest some alternative actions? 85
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shopping malls. In your own experience, is it a positive trend? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65964912281 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27366728715 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554385964912 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.2399751969 50.4703680194 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.636363636 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425402137594 0.242375264174 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199644654 0.0925447433944 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938412697393 0.071462118173 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275214354984 0.151781067708 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811523169656 0.0609392437508 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.