Recently, the phenomenon of considering music as important as other subjects in school to promote learning in children life and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that passing a music course is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that adding music to school's curriculum can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From educational standpoint, learning a musical instrument can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that natural talent, as well as equal opportunity to develop talents, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the effectiveness of acquiring playing piano on intellectual abilities. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both better concentration as well as better cognitive skills apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of economy, adding new courses to school's curriculum might increase the consequences of wasting money. Moreover, fundamental aspects of purchasing musical instruments for students relate to this reality that demerits of not affordable prices pertain to new educational system. As a tangible example, A scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of is correlated negatively with students' failior.
To conclude, as for myself, analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of paying attention to music music as an equal subject far outweigh its disadvantages. With the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ifications of both better concentration as well as better cognitive skills apparently can ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ersity has asserted that the downside of is correlated negatively with students f...
^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: music
...t the advantages of paying attention to music music as an equal subject far outweigh its di...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64925373134 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25190795136 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64552238806 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.979540222 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.636363636 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171299762581 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592102869622 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923871382343 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946285783383 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831498586496 0.0609392437508 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.01 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.