Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or
disagree? Give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of considering the importance of the music in the schools' curriculums as other subjects and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although this idea is beneficial as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponent views. I am inclined to believe that this considering can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, the idea of deeming the importance of learning musical lessons in the ordinaru curriculum in schools or universities can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of modern educational system. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these benefits. Fristly, instructing musical instruments and how to play them can diminish and release the stress among the youths which is one of the most paramount difficulities that the pupils have. Moreover, learning the musical subjects can boost the dull atmosphere of theoretical education in formal curriculum. Furthermore, being familiar with music and developing the ability of playing some music instruments thrive the learning skills and also can alter the young generations' behaviour and attitudes.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that the idea of putting the same concentration on music like the other educational subjects has some opponents. According to research undertaken by a prestigious world-renowned university, learning music is not really priority for the youngesters and they should focus on some crucial subjects including mathematics, physics or chemistry.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of the importance of studying music for young pupils are far more outweigh their demerits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Ahmed Abuelmagd | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
- The world’s governments and organizations are facing a lot of issues. Which do you think is the most pressing problem for the inhabitants on our planet and give the solution? 11
- Cashless society is becoming a reality More and more people are using credit cards for payment and less people use cash How realistic do you think it is and what do you see in its potential benefits or problems 89
- With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universitiesshould only procure digital materials rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantagesand disadvantages of this position an 77
- Life experience is a better teacher than school or foreign education. Give an example and support opinion. 88
- Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 835, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
...ing skills and also can alter the young generations behaviour and attitudes. On the one ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, really, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54982817869 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13319908446 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59793814433 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.1228035453 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.818181818 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213067258401 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082602036573 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540818722708 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122287954431 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416540220615 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.