Some universities deduct students’ marks if assignment is given late. What is your opinion and suggest some alternative actions?
recently, deducting mark from students' in case of giving assignments late has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question, "are there any alternative actions?". Whereas it is a widely held view that universities politics are highly beneficial, I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, students' marks are bound up inextricably with assignments, which indicates they lead to both doing on-time and correct. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between students' activities and score results an exponential increase in academic achievements. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the likelihood of occurring last minute assignments is correlated positively with not only universities but also students' marks.
Within the realms of sociology, without the slightest doubt, mark deductions attribute to more responsibility and being on-time, in that it would come down to self-improvements, better scores, and becoming more reliable. A salient example of such attribution is punishments, which is a concern since it was mistaken to take education improvements for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint education systems' problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of mark deductions.
To conclude, as for my self, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that, universities must deduct students in case of late doing assignments. However, we perceive that, with the benefit of hindsight, the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Hurry | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | 6tttcj | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-11 | Kushi | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-28 | reza_irani | 85 | view |
- A cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and fewer people use cash. Howrealistic do you think it is? And do you think it is beneficial or problematic? 85
- Cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and less people use cash. Howrealistic do you think it is ? And do you think it is beneficial or problematic? 85
- Some people argue that experience is the best teacher. Life experiences can teach more effectively than books orformal school education. How far do you agree with this idea? Support your opinion with reasons and/or your personal experience. 85
- Large shopping malls are replacing small local shops in cities and towns. In your own experience, is it a positive development? 85
- Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues – such as environmental problems – thatwe should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Recently
recently, deducting mark from students in case o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'universities'' or 'university's'?
Suggestion: universities'; university's
.... Whereas it is a widely held view that universities politics are highly beneficial, I will ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84501845018 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35851339222 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690036900369 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4072745659 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214397797692 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616770633264 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781661578899 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124772857982 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690635343259 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.