Students can obtain information of academic subject from online, the printed books and articles, and discussion with their teachers and their peers. Which one is the most reliable source?
Recently, the phenomenon of studying academic subjects in different ways and their corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of learning from online sources is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that standard education methods in classrooms can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, obtaining new information from various situations can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of communication with others, as well as studying a useful book, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered more than 45% of students prefer online learning. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both considering different aspects of learning and using comprehensive methods apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, reliable information is vital in the process of learning and might increase the consequences of fake knowledge. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of academic methods could relate to this reality that demerits of superficial information pertain to unreliable online data. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by UCLA university has asserted that the downside of successful graduates is correlated negatively with unorganized learning ways. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of dependable references.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of utilizing modern methods in schools far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the comprehensive approach of education prove the significance of studying in groups, but also pinpoint trust in expert teachers' implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72260273973 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22398904571 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 139.433497537 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643835616438 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7715994817 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.25 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233130628117 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620711522946 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547817911209 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11218933458 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676564280112 0.0609392437508 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 55.0591133005 207% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.