Studying works of literature of a hundred years ago is a waste of time for students in today. Agree or disagree, give your reasons and example
Recently, the phenomenon of studying literature and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of learning literature is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that studying programs can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the work of literature can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the classical literature, as well as literature sciences, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered improving knowledge. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the modern literature and the role of literature in studying apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, wasting the students time might increase the consequences of school curriculums. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the learning environment could relate to this reality that demerits of the necessary information pertain to practical skills. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the ancient history is correlated negatively with the student abilities. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the student performance.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of studying subjects far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the learning equipment prove the significance of the contemporary literature, but also pinpoint learning facilities implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73484848485 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.293102609 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628787878788 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7183013397 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.166666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149859026568 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502098751338 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382319880806 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774853434675 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349952474335 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.