Recently, the phenomenon of Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that reduce their investment in arts can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious
university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of investment in arts, music and painting far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
- Some people think that dangerous sports should be banned while others disagree Do you agree or disagree State your opinion and support it with reasons and or examples from your own experience or observations 85
- Government should reduce their investment in arts music and painting Agree or disagree 88
- In this technological world the number of new inventions has been increasing Please describe a new invention and determine whether it will bring advantages or disadvantages 84
- In this technological world the number of new inventions has been increasing Please describe a new invention and determine whether it will bring advantages or disadvantages 84
- In this technological world the number of new inventions has been increasing Please describe a new invention and determine whether it will bring advantages or disadvantages 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72727272727 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18481100229 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617424242424 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7551413744 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.454545455 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340367058517 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123003498532 0.0925447433944 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150064147149 0.071462118173 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179641541437 0.151781067708 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124113818899 0.0609392437508 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72727272727 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18481100229 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617424242424 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7551413744 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.454545455 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340367058517 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123003498532 0.0925447433944 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150064147149 0.071462118173 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179641541437 0.151781067708 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124113818899 0.0609392437508 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.