Technology allows us to have a useful and interesting life than in the past .Do you agree or disagree?
“The only thing that interferes with my learning is education.” – Albert Einstein. What did he mean by that? Do you think he is correct?
Recently, the phenomenon of the only interference and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the educational interference is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning skills can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning methods can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of external interference, as well as learners’ needs, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered educational contexts. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both formal education and the adverse interference apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the basic education might increase the consequences of quick learners. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of educational requirements could relate to this reality that the demerits of avoiding interference pertain to primary education. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of human interference is correlated negatively with community education. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of learning approaches.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of interfering issues far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of educated individuals prove the significance of causing interference, but also pinpoint providing learning implications.
- Technology allows us to have a useful and interesting life than in the past .Do you agree or disagree?“The only thing that interferes with my learning is education.” – Albert Einstein. What did he mean by that? Do you think he is correct? 80
- A healthy diet is more effective for keeping fit than exercise. What is your opinion? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95669291339 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42427356549 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653543307087 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4587927429 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.083333333 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121759311739 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406102906578 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029504057905 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0675301057231 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00763976204907 0.0609392437508 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.