Television has many useful functions to play in everyone’s life, for some its relaxation, for some it is the companion. Discuss your viewpoint and support your answer with examples and discussion point.
Nowadays, the phenomenon of television popularity and its corresponding impacts has attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention from the public. Although contested by many that the matter of public mass media is highly beneficial, such particular advent is regarded both constructive and positive by substantial number of individuals. In my opinion, I am convinced to believe that functions of TV in people's lives could be a plus, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
Form the social standpoint, playing a vital role of television in the community could provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes are inextricably boud up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment discovered current policies. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both advancing social activities and sense of contribution to society apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, useful functions of TV might increase the consequences of critical needs. As far as the society is concerned, the ultimate aim of watching TV is to enhance public awareness. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that downside of people's knowledge is correlated negatively with this media developments. Hence, is it correct to presume the preconceived notion of such remarkable mass media.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both side, I profoundly believe that television's popularity and advantages is far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages prove the significance of this unique phenomenon, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-14 | sara malla | 77 | view |
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? 85
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss 88
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems…so who do you think should be responsible for solving it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? 11
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems…so who do you think should be responsible for solving it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? 11
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ugh contested by many that the matter of public mass media is highly beneficial, ...
^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'televisions'' or 'television's'?
Suggestion: televisions'; television's
...on both side, I profoundly believe that televisions popularity and advantages is far outwei...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5962962963 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24709218868 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640740740741 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3369421034 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.916666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0981227492051 0.242375264174 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297074779861 0.0925447433944 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310550759081 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0527613794809 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130172515427 0.0609392437508 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.