These days, certain jobs are meant for men or women and this can not be changed much. I certainly agree with this notion, and due to the nature of job, I think it is wise to allocate certain work to particular gender. This essay will discuss this in detail and offer unbiased conclusion.
To begin with, jobs needs certain task to be performed and it requires specific skills. Men or women who has better skills pertaining to a specific task, those should be deployed to complete the task. For instance, Combat army forces require more physically strong people and people especially men who are part of these forces need to be part of rigorous physical activities. In other words, men are more suitable for this job as women can not compete in this field due to less physical strength. Therefore, it is necessary to allocate certain jobs to men or women.
Moreover, In this competitive World the person who has better skills will survive which means one should stick to jobs where he or she has comparative advantage. Jobs such Kindergarten school teachers, Firefighters etc needs certain skills which are closely related with gender. For instance, in nursery schools, female teachers can be more effective because they know how to deal with kids better than their male counterparts. Hence, it will be wise to execute certain jobs by specific gender.
In conclusion, though I certainly believe gender equality in the workforce but few jobs areas are such where a particular gender can excel and outperformed their counterparts. So I think there is no harm in it because it will be a win win situation for everyone.
- There are more men or women in certain jobs and there s nothing we can change about it Do you agree with that 94
- Some people suggest that each family should only have one car and encourage alternative vehicle. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 55
- Is it better to be a good listener or good talker 84
- Do you think cashless society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages? 11
- Some people could stay effective in their lives by doing the repetitive routine, such as eating the same diet. Do you think it can apply to everyone? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: win
...e is no harm in it because it will be a win win situation for everyone.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88405797101 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61613271616 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539855072464 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6238092225 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2857142857 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 6.9802955665 186% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259236115683 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107949264259 0.0925447433944 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794591769623 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163517310541 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649431126744 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 56.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.