In towns and cities, large shopping malls should replace the small local shops. Agree or disagree?
In recent times, in every city, the number of shopping malls is rapidly increasing and replacing the small local shops. While in the past, many small local shops fulfill the needs of the people, whereas these days a fewer number of large malls coupled with flexible financing options have made people become greedier. This essay will explain, whether large shopping malls should replace the small local shops or not and lead to a plausible conclusion.
First and foremost, there are myriad reasons which proponents cite the need for large shopping malls. One of the most preponderant reasons is the convenience in shopping over a huge variety of products in one-stop place. For example, people can buy international or national branded accessories and clothes, and day-to-day groceries in one single hub and does not need them to go from post to pillar to buy multiple products. Hence, these days large shopping malls have become a more flexible and convenient way of shopping.
On the downside, due to large malls, many small local shops are running out of businesses. According to a recent survey by Times Magazine, it is clear that large malls are one of the major reason for raising capitalism. With more number of local shop owners, the wealth is equally shared, but due to large malls more people are losing jobs and create an imbalance in wealth share. However, shopping malls have created a revolution in doing shopping, the rise in capitalism due to closing down small shops is a big concern for many.
In conclusion, every towns and cities are witnessing local shops are being replaced by large shopping malls. In my opinion, small local shops should not be replaced by big malls, just to keep the wealth-sharing even and reduce capitalism.
- Governments should reduce the investments in arts music and painting and instead focus solely on the economic development of the country Do you agree or disagree 84
- Effective learning requires time, peace and comfort, and should not be mixed with employment. Study and employment don’t go hand-in-hand. To what extend do you agree with the above statements? Support your opinion with examples. 77
- Should governments build more roads to allow more vehicles, or should they improve the network of public transports? Give your opinion. 77
- People spend too much time on their work rather than on their personal life and experience time shortage What problems will it cause them What could be the possible solutions 89
- In a cashless society, people use credit cards more often. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, so, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 20.9802955665 33% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97278911565 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5281606148 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537414965986 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3480273414 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.461538462 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4111502798 0.242375264174 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172584527668 0.0925447433944 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108659997823 0.071462118173 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275521981146 0.151781067708 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118348214077 0.0609392437508 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.