University only requires to apply digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook. Agree or disagree.
I has long been a subject of discussion whether University should apply digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook. In my opinion, the former notion has several elements that deserve attention and I will explain why using pertinent arguments.
There are myriad of arguments in favor of my context, and the most conspicuous one lie in the fact that people should be extra careful with their decision. For example, according to recent survey done by the Standford University, 45% people benefits from the above mention notion, whereas 30% people face disadvantages due to it. Hence, it is apparent why many citizens are in the favor of above stance.
Another argument in support of my view is that governments world wide have become more active in dealing with this situation. To illustrate, as per a recent academic research carried out by the Australian government, 60% citizens gained immensely from the proposed governments reforms. They improved their existing scenario tremendously and that paved the way for a better economic future.
Therefore, not only will this make people more careful and pragmatic in their approach, but also will it lead to a better living standard.
From what has been discussed above, it is clear that the benefits of the given topic significantly out weight the drawbacks. Lastly, in my opinion, it would be wise to say that University only requires to apply digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-23 | PAULO ROBERTO OLIVEIRA SILVA | 55 | view |
| 2020-11-09 | Basil3241 | 67 | view |
| 2020-09-23 | parveen123456 | 77 | view |
| 2020-07-16 | mike trazer | 54 | view |
| 2020-06-06 | mike trazer | 82 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
I has long been a subject of discussion wheth...
^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
... support of my view is that governments world wide have become more active in dealing with...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
... support of my view is that governments world wide have become more active in dealing with...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22457627119 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77429139794 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622881355932 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2741427741 50.4703680194 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.090909091 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242583254644 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985124559088 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.202299014947 0.071462118173 283% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149581142033 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172208074627 0.0609392437508 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.