University only requires applying media rather than continously upgrading text book. Agree or disagree?
In this modern world, there is an ongoing delibration among people on the use of digital media rather than upgrading text books. Some people argue on the negative affects of digital media, on my point of view I agree with that proposal considering various numbers of factors. In this esssy, I shall discuss on the factors strengthening my arguement.
First and foremost, universities can use digital media more than schools since there are lot of adullts compared with a school. For instance, university lectures can be uploaded to the university website in order to facilitate the students in studying from home. Consequently they can save money on transportation and time as well. In addition, universities may not have to operate in large premises due to digital distance learning programme and even they do not have to maintain physical libraries inside the premises.
On the other hand, some people prefer to use physical material for studying, while some people prefer to learn from a teacher other than from online lecture. However, this move is not encouraged in modern student life because printing and paper work costs more to the environment, by being neglected the sustainable goals of the United Nations.
In conclusion it is recommended to promote digital media from the primary or secondary school in order to make the student adapted before entering universities. It is beleived that, continuously upgrading text book is an ineffective move compared with the technological development that is experienced by the habitants. Finally, governments and educational organizations needs to invest more on digital infrastructure to make this a reality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...te the students in studying from home. Consequently they can save money on transportation a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to programme'
Suggestion: to programme
...emises due to digital distance learning programme and even they do not have to maintain p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hysical libraries inside the premises. On the other hand, some people prefer to...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32575757576 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99700454985 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594696969697 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2349585652 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.166666667 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.25397266985 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166160555125 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568954413218 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623957650332 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941701374205 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511035977916 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.