Violence portrayed on TV and the movies lead to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree?
The importance of different characters portrayed on TV, which has always been debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of violence shown on screen has sparked contention over the potential impact of this trend in recent years. This essay will elaborate that individuals who watch violent content on television are more prone to become criminals.
Firstly, there are numerous reasons why teenagers are more likely to get influenced by extreme action movies, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that it makes them more angry, impatient and indirectly force them to take crime in their hands. As an illustration, according to my own experience, when I was a college student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that youngsters want to attempt robbery, murder, and kidnapping after watching similar kind of plots on the television screen. Thus, violent scenes and stories play a vital role in an individual’s life.
Secondly, the key justification for upholding this notion is rooted in the fact that what we see is what we become. Furthermore, people get inspired to take negative short cuts to get rich and do not think twice before committing a crime as shown on television. For example, research conducted by a prestigious university has asserted that eighty-five percent of criminal activities in the society is directly related to the conspiracies and criminal movies broadcasted in theatres. Thus, violent movies released in theatres and cinemas plays an imperative role in creating more criminals.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the role of violent fighting scenes and abusive songs broadcasted on television leads to increased crime in the world. Not only these movies are a poor reflection of criminal mindset but also it has devastating effects on society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Daniela Apolo Machado | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | maninder1989 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | maninder1989 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | Prabu | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | smb.arami | 85 | view |
- Online language learning has advantages over classroom instruction.Choose whether you agree or disagree with this statement and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading 80
- Studying at a good overseas university is better than studying at a university in your own country.Choose whether you agree or disagree with this statement and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own expe 88
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? 88
- How widely of you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause? 77
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34237288136 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99680189585 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623728813559 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9843728948 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.333333333 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 2.75862068966 362% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294262305908 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892288239357 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589171071813 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150130952303 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268920672659 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.