Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of violence portrayed on TV and in the movies and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of entertaining activities played on TV is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that crime scene depicted in mass media increase in crime can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, mass media can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of a source of information, as well as human behaviour, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered some useful websites. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both enthusiastic audiences and social norms apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the scene portrayed on TV might increase the consequences of law and crime. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the criminal offence could relate to this reality that the demerits of violent acts pertain to racial harassment. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of watching mass-media is correlated negatively with physical violence. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of social behaviour.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the mass media far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of TV prove the significance of good behaviour, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Daniela Apolo Machado | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | maninder1989 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | maninder1989 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | Prabu | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | smb.arami | 85 | view |
- If voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what conclusions can we draw about “The nature of democracy”? 85
- extreme sports 88
- Whether design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? give your opinion. 88
- If you are assigned to work on a study on climate change, what will you choose to focus on and why? 11
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45387453875 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21157883922 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630996309963 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3752307815 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.166666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130914895521 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457177223195 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548948491428 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0727979081973 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506862937709 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.