Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree.

Essay topics:

Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree.

Recently, the phenomenon of violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in our society and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that people who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a general standpoint, violence portrayed on TV can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramification of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of a public arena, people who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that violence portrayed on TV leads people to become more criminals far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implication.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-13 Daniela Apolo Machado 55 view
2020-01-02 maninder1989 77 view
2019-12-31 maninder1989 77 view
2019-12-23 Prabu 77 view
2019-10-15 smb.arami 85 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly believe that violence portrayed on TV leads people to become more criminals fa...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56296296296 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12781231479 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614814814815 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7496358266 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.545454545 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32226984506 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106959190409 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123866872001 0.071462118173 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18485056053 0.151781067708 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983364132453 0.0609392437508 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.