We have entered a throw-away society and fill the environment with rubbish. What are the causes and what are sour solutions.
The topic of a throw-away society and fill the environment with rubbish has become a heated debate among authorities. Although many people assert that it is individuals duty to contribute in eliminating rubbish around, the others refute this proposal saying that it is purely governments responsibility to help clean the environment. This essay will discuss the main causes of throw-away society and reach a logical conclusion.
On the one hand, there are many causes linked with the environmental rubbish in which the most preponderant one will be the raw waste from industries which is increasing in the modern technological era. Household waste and extra packing products are also taking part in throw-away society. For example, a study showed that only in India throw-away rubbish has reached at an alarming level just in past couple of years thereby resulting in a number of diseases. Hence, There are many factors that are the reasons for rubbish pollution.
On the other hand, there are many solutions which can be proposed in order to make surrounding clean and clear in which the most effective one could be the individual's awareness by campaigns. Secondly, governments can also play a great role just by implementing strict laws and regulations against the corporations and people involved in spreading rubbish. For example, a survey revealed that Japan has recently overcome this problem just by applying stringent laws against the culprits. Thus, with the help of proper rules and regulations rubbish detriments can be controlled to an extent.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the causes and proposed solutions for the environmental rubbish. Therefore, in my opinion, individual role in this regard is for more important in the society.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-28 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 85 | view |
- Credit cards are beneficial for people, discuss 80
- It has recently been suggested that classic or dead languages, Latin and Greek should be re-introduced into the school curriculum. Those that oppose the idea claim that the ancient languages are of no practical use and no help in getting a job. Those in f 77
- Should goverment build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport. 77
- In towns and cities, large shopping malls should replace the small local shops. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Gove your response with justification. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 157, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ich the most effective one could be the individuals awareness by campaigns. Secondly, gover...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33691756272 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94349260461 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.755564805 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.538461538 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184796593517 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755011476206 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814283961891 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11966458372 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832355147253 0.0609392437508 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.