When you look for work, some people think salary is more important while others think work condition is more important. Which one is more important when you are looking for a job?
The importance of salary or work condition in looking for a job, which is always debatable, has now become more controversial. It is believed that working condition does have several positive impacts. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the argument that the work condition is more important than salary. This article will elaborate how working condition thus lead to a constructive conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why work condition has much more benefits, and the most conspicuous one lies the fact that working atmosphere has a significant impact on employees. A study recently published the Scientific American shows that employees' productivity has been improved by 40% by working in a diligent and comfortable environment. Therefore, working condition plays a crucial role in seeking for a job.
In addition, to put more emphasis, another justification for upholding this notion is that a decent salary is not always dispensable in terms of choosing a job. For example, researchers indicate that one third of employees are still willing to work hard and start a working long-term relationship if its corporation cultures are consistent with employees' personal values, although salary is not satisfied.
Considering all the substantial insights which are outlined above, one can safely reach a conclusion that the advantages of work condition outweigh those of job salary. Hence, working culture and working environment seem to become more important when looking for a job.
- What is the strength and weakness of the public transportation system in your country 69
- When you look for work, some people think salary is more important while others think work condition is more important. Which one is more important when you are looking for a job? 77
- The only way to reduce air pollution is to increase the prices of fuels for vehicles What is your opinion and explain with your own experiences and examples 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 254, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...shed the Scientific American shows that employees productivity has been improved by 40% b...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, so, still, therefore, third, thus, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35864978903 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05689140982 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599156118143 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8781152604 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.454545455 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438039983385 0.242375264174 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182494117048 0.0925447433944 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129911612797 0.071462118173 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280026671445 0.151781067708 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853068533698 0.0609392437508 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.