When you look for work, some people think salary is more important while others think work condition is more important. Which one is more important when you are looking for a job?
The importance of salary or work condition in looking for a job, which is always debatable, has now become more controversial. It is believed that working condition does have several positive impacts. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the argument that the work condition is more important than salary. This article will elaborate how working condition thus lead to a constructive conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why work condition has much more benefits, and the most conspicuous one lies the fact that working atmosphere has a significant impact on employees. A study recently published the Scientific American shows that employees' productivity has been improved by 40% by working in a diligent and comfortable environment. Therefore, working condition plays a crucial role in seeking for a job.
In addition, to put more emphasis, another justification for upholding this notion is that a decent salary is not always dispensable in terms of choosing a job. For example, researchers indicate that one third of employees are still willing to work hard and start a working long-term relationship if its corporation cultures are consistent with employees' personal values, although salary is not satisfied.
Considering all the substantial insights which are outlined above, one can safely reach a conclusion that the advantages of work condition outweigh those of job salary. Hence, working culture and working environment seem to become more important when looking for a job.
- When you look for work, some people think salary is more important while others think work condition is more important. Which one is more important when you are looking for a job? 77
- The only way to reduce air pollution is to increase the prices of fuels for vehicles What is your opinion and explain with your own experiences and examples 83
- What is the strength and weakness of the public transportation system in your country 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 254, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...shed the Scientific American shows that employees productivity has been improved by 40% b...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, so, still, therefore, third, thus, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35864978903 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05689140982 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599156118143 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8781152604 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.454545455 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438039983385 0.242375264174 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182494117048 0.0925447433944 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129911612797 0.071462118173 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280026671445 0.151781067708 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853068533698 0.0609392437508 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.