Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work?
Although such topics, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on whether the design of buildings have a positive effect or not can lead thought-provoking discussion. My view is that irrespective of the numerous arguments that exist on either side, designs of buildings have a positive effect which eliminates many problems in the life. In this essay, I shall delineate my points and calculations by considering both sides of arguments.
There are number of reasons in favor of my viewpoint. One of them is that a good and sound design encourages proper ventilation and natural light in the building which helps to promote good health of the people. Moreover, with the help of better design of a building, few problems of daily life like parking facility and fire exit in the case of emergency can be addressed properly. Thus, we can say that design of building have a huge positive impact in people’s life and work.
There are few aspects of impact of building’s design of people’s life and work that needed special mentioning. Firstly, with the better design of building, one can able to focus on the work and feel comfortable in the workplace. Therefore, considering the work place, the role of building’s design is very crucial.
Therefore, aforesaid reasons uphold the position that the design of building of design plays a crucial role not only in life of people of people but also at the workplace.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'yield'.
Suggestion: will never yield
...lthough such topics, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'of people'.
Suggestion: of people
...n plays a crucial role not only in life of people of people but also at the workplace. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of people but also at the workplace.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10699588477 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0508290889 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539094650206 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 384.3 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0806923496 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.818181818 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.514833721171 0.242375264174 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194782699762 0.0925447433944 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166028391421 0.071462118173 232% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306834284664 0.151781067708 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498984678749 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.