Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of building design’s impact on people’s life and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of architectural features is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that an impressive building can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the modern architecture can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of a luxury apartment, as well as the interior designer, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the decorating job opportunities, the handmade goods and the contemporary art. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the modern lifestyles and positive work opportunities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the building design might increase the consequences of physical health problems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of a modern construction could relate to this reality that the demerits of working at a high level pertain to physical damages such as hand broken, falling fear and head injuries. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the high ceiling is correlated negatively with low ventilation. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a property developer.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the ancient architect building far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the building design prove the significance of equal opportunities, but also pinpoint luxurious life implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | maninder1989 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | jashan randhawa | 55 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | jashan randhawa | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | kcowz1110 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | sajid.uett | 65 | view |
- music is as important as other subjects in school to promote learning in children life 85
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 88
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree? 36
- cashless society 85
- extreme sports 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65505226481 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36412187361 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641114982578 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7024110709 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.25 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249607139531 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076155792317 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982540732912 0.071462118173 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132024871911 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972069445585 0.0609392437508 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.