Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work?
The architecture and design of the building can influrence the life and work style of the people in positive and negative manners. Some people think that the outlook of the building has more positive effects, while others maintain that they have more negative effects. This essay will elaborate that the positive impacts of unique desgined buildings into the life and work styles of various people.
Firstly, there are myriad of arguments in favour of positive effects of building’s architecture on an individual’s lifestyle. To begin with, people are more attracted towards towers and bulidings of unique designs. Moreover, buildings with new and attractive shapes ignite cognitive skills in an individual and lead to study the benefits of these styles. As an example, buildings designed with natural ventilation will lead people to incorporate same design while constructing their homes. As a matter of fact, new architectures and designed buildings bear an extremely positive effect in the life style of people.
Furthermore, the inner structure of buildings also has a deep impact of people’s mood swing. Buildings with well constructed and large spacious offices will boost people to work more efficiently as it will have a direct effect on workers mentality. On the other hand, congested offices and buildings will narrow down the thinking of the workers. For instance, a glance on well constructed and beautifully designed building can bear a more soothing effect on an individual and at times release the stress level too. As a result, inner and outer architecture of a building tremendously effects the mood of the people.
In conclusion, foregoing discussion propounds the view that buildings with attractive designs not only effects the people’s life style but also has an impact on their moods and working habits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | maninder1989 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | jashan randhawa | 55 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | jashan randhawa | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | kcowz1110 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | sajid.uett | 65 | view |
- a groupe of people like to spend money rather save it why they do this what are the avantages and disadvantages 73
- Whether studying films at school is as important as studying literature? 77
- ‘Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers, whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.’ 100
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? Do you agree or disagree? 77
- “In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...ntly as it will have a direct effect on workers mentality. On the other hand, congested...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.5418719212 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40344827586 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96672188844 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8706651486 50.4703680194 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.928571429 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2857142857 7.25397266985 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.47695972738 0.242375264174 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179213028714 0.0925447433944 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105493030509 0.071462118173 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323520936106 0.151781067708 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930854262633 0.0609392437508 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.