Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work?
Recently, the phenomemnon of constructing new buildings with particular design or renovating the old ones and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although this changing is beneficial as it regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that this issue can be a plus as it could develop brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, there are several advantages of considering new, modern and particular kind of designing in constructing new buildings. These benefits are rooted in the fact of having beautiful look of cities. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the effects of renovating and using modern design in cities. Firstly, using new and modern kinds of designing has beneficial effects on tourism industry. A city with an beautiful and interesting view absorb an array of tourists. Therefore, the enhancing of this industry affects the economy and settlers can have the active economy and market. Furthermore, this issue have deep impacts on inspiration and the behaviour of the people whi live there. Observing interesting forms, shapes and colour can diminish the stress which exist in big cities and the inhabitants with the sedantary lifestyle.
On the one hand, there is no doubt, the idea of utilizing new and modern types of designing for buildings has some opponents. They argued that the government has some other piriorities for its budget, and it should reduce its expenditure and invest on the other significant topics including education, health and security.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of having modern design in cities is far more outweigh of its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | maninder1989 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | jashan randhawa | 55 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | jashan randhawa | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | kcowz1110 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | sajid.uett | 65 | view |
- People succeed because of their hard work; luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 77
- Right amount of motivation and practice can teach one better than the training given to him in classrooms by teachers. 80
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems…so who do you think should be responsible for solving it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? 88
- Cities are now expanding the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership Agree or Disagree 11
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? (Give your reasons.) 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ffects on tourism industry. A city with an beautiful and interesting view absorb a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36610169492 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98967677071 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0346243975 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.071428571 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127720219165 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453500322389 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447559493995 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723246248717 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209892024635 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.