Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work
The importance of innovative design of buildings and their effects on people’s life and work has always been a debatable topic. There is deluge of arguments supporting the fact that proper design of buildings and infrastructure will have a positive impact on the habitats. I completely agree with this and will further explain with examples in this essay, that how design of buildings will improve life of the residents.
First and foremost, the innovative design of buildings gets the attention and more people desire to work at such places. They provide a sense of accomplishment and give energy to the employees to work hard and increase their productivity. For example, innovative designs will increase the work efficiency and create good profits for the companies. This example clearly indicates that there is a correlation between new designs and work productivity.
Secondly, infrastructure plays an important role in one’s life and health. With the new designs the companies are focusing on more green buildings where plants can also be grown in the galleries of high rise buildings, and greenery is proven to improve the mood and health of people. For example, with better ventilation designs certain diseases can be avoided nowadays. This all has been made possible with new design approaches and technologies.
To conclude, better designs of the buildings will improve life of the residents and employees and companies should focus more on enhancing the quality of work and residential life at such places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | maninder1989 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | jashan randhawa | 55 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | jashan randhawa | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | kcowz1110 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | sajid.uett | 65 | view |
- Benefits and problems of studying and work related to old theatre play in high schools. Give your opinion with examples. 80
- Whether studying films at school is as important as studing literature? 77
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage. What problems it cause? 72
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Do you think cardless society is realistic and why What are the advantages and disadvantages 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30041152263 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91761131014 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514403292181 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.0 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4772741452 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.25397266985 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398277387651 0.242375264174 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14499111034 0.0925447433944 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935444829783 0.071462118173 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251084981344 0.151781067708 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124949456818 0.0609392437508 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.