Whether design of buildings will have a positive or
negative impact on people's life and work?
The importance of innovative designs impacting people's life and work was always a debatable topic. Many people state that design of buildings will have positive impact on society. In my opinion, I completely agree with the statement that in the modern world infrastructure plays an key role. The following would further elaborate the reasons why design of buildings will have impact on people with examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
Firstly, innovative designs motivates the people to work in company and enhance creating thinking as they are working in better infrastructure facility. In present world, people are more attracted to engage with companies which has proper infrastructure and design. For example, innovative designs and buildings encourage employees to work more better and at the same time it will also increase the productivity that yields good profits and name to the organization. This example clearly exemplifies us that there is a correlation between designs and employee productivity.
Secondly, infrastructure plays an vital role in one's life and health. Modern buildings built have good positive impact on people as they give good air to breath in and provide aesthetic view. Few designs have a scientific impact on people health. For example, buildings with innovative designs and good ventilation facilities will have less chance of obtaining diseases such as Allergy, Dust disease and many more. Modern buildings provide enough space for one's privacy. From the above analysis, it is clear that health of people will totally depend upon the construction and design of new buildings.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that design of buildings will have positive impact on people's life and work and further the organizations need to take initiative to build buildings with proper infrastructure by keeping employees health in mind.
- due to professional work, we ignoring family and personal work. do u agree? how diff to achieve 80
- Some people believe that the sole aim of higher education is to make people ready for employment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Discuss 77
- technology and new inventions is it beneficial or detrimental to the society? 95
- Nowadays Television has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news & awareness and for some, it acts like a companion. What is your opinion 77
- technology and new inventions is it beneficial or detrimental to the society? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...n the modern world infrastructure plays an key role. The following would further e...
^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...creating thinking as they are working in better infrastructure facility. In prese...
^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...d buildings encourage employees to work more better and at the same time it will also incre...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...vity. Secondly, infrastructure plays an vital role in ones life and health. Mod...
^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
..., infrastructure plays an vital role in ones life and health. Modern buildings built...
^^^^
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...dern buildings provide enough space for ones privacy. From the above analysis, it is...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45973154362 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94139145702 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530201342282 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8068779046 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.466666667 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470820109191 0.242375264174 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180979836868 0.0925447433944 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129019916365 0.071462118173 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33543060481 0.151781067708 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085358405066 0.0609392437508 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.