Whether designing of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
The controversial topic with respect to the design of building whether has affected people's lives never fails to attract public attention. having always believed that public buildings strongly integrate in citizen's lives, I tend to be advocate that the design of building has affected, either positively or negatively, one where people live and work. First and foremost, it is evidently reasonable for one to think that building design has influenced individuals in positive and negative way on account of affecting people's security. Most buildings nowadays have safety facilities like fire drills to secure people's life and emergency access to evacuate. This design promotes the safety factor of the building and saves many people's life when they come up to the danger. Furthermore, the fact that architecture design can determine people's working efficiency also adds weight to my argument. Conventional wisdom has it that ultimately the aim of building design is elevating efficiency. For instance, some modern buildings uses time-saving design like elevators which make citizens have easy access to different floors. However, some multifunctional buildings may distract people when they enter these architectures and waste their time. In a nutshell, for the aforementioned affecting people's security and determining working efficiency, I wholeheartedly endorse that the design of building has affected, either positively or negatively, on where people live or work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Having
...ever fails to attract public attention. having always believed that public buildings s...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, for instance, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.5418719212 28% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69545454545 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98335257085 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595454545455 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2375993783 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.3 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450150768888 0.242375264174 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179321675108 0.0925447433944 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614543232668 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.450150768888 0.151781067708 297% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.