Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree or experience is a more effective way to teach compared to boos, agree or disagree?

Over the years experimental learning has gained more popularity and benefited more students across the world in the field of management, engineering and technology. There are large array of factors which accounts for this soaring concern. This essay will elucidate succinctly the main engender of this upsurge and suggest some potential benefits.

Formal education works well for the conventional studies be it for engineering, science or medicine. It is required to learn fundamental and to get basic understanding of the topic. For example, doctors, engineers and other conventional professions requires formal study which teaches them the theory of the subject. That is pivotal to build a strong knowledgebase which will help them to develop expertise.

However when it comes to unconventional professions, such as musician, chef or sportsman, the formal study barely helps. We can hardly find a musician who can play guitar by just reading book. The same goes for the cook as well. With experience, skills gets mature and person gets more confidence. Avionics is also one area which rely more on experience such as flying hours required for to complete certification. Experiencing work related to your field of interest sharpens your skill set and enhances your chances of finding an employment opportunity right after graduation

To recapitulate, the forgoing discussion profound the view that the experience is best teacher. However, there is no magic pill which we can use and conclude that the experimental learning is right or not. In my opinion, Experiential learning or work based learning is a fundamental concept in this day and age. An age where nano technology is vigorously changing the course of our job market and education landscape.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'arrays'?
Suggestion: arrays
...neering and technology. There are large array of factors which accounts for this soar...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...will help them to develop expertise. However when it comes to unconventional profess...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...n profound the view that the experience is best teacher. However, there is no magic pil...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, for example, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2625 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91987621028 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9928880459 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.2 104.977214359 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.9669160288 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26666666667 7.25397266985 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143724156945 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448375293913 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352204254335 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824943233407 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127170737301 0.0609392437508 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.