Younger employees have more skills, knowledge and more motivated than older employees. To what extent do you agree or disagree, support your argument with your own experience?

Essay topics:

Younger employees have more skills, knowledge and more motivated than older employees. To what extent do you agree or disagree, support your argument with your own experience?

Recently, the phenomenon of younger employees have more skills, knowledge and more motivated than older employees, and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complicated procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regulated thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive. I am inclined to believe that younger employees are more motivated than older employees can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, having more skills, knowledge and more motivated young employees can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in this fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current processes. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and accordingly complex phenomenon apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, older employees are less motivated than young, knowledgeable and skillful employees might increase the consequences of vital issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted, the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the young, skillful, motivated employees are more recruited by the employers than old employees far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-31 Maheswari 77 view
2019-10-05 kathyngo95 77 view
2019-08-25 hemsingh81 80 view
2019-02-05 baran.bahrani 88 view
2019-01-09 dhavalpatel095 88 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82222222222 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15497299439 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622222222222 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7927418551 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.909090909 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312988381673 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108810384862 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116792384697 0.071462118173 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180903027856 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083170585835 0.0609392437508 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.