Good teachers set challenging task for students. Do you agree or disagree, and why?
In my personal view good teachers should sometimes set challenging tasks for their students to enhance their capabilities in managing challenging situations as well as bolstering their self-confidence.
Dealing with challenging situations has some undeniable advantages. Thus, students should be subjected to such benefits by being involved in those situations. School teachers have unique positions to provide the challenges in a well-controlled and closely-monitored circumstances. Overcoming a difficult or complicated task helps the students construct an invulnerable self-confidence while discovering their unlocked talents and capabilities.
For example, assigning a relatively challenging group project, which need some level of cooperation and hard work to be fulfilled, to students of a class will teach them how to organize a team work, exploit their abilities to do a collaborative task, search for reliable sources of information, and manage the problem. Accomplishing such task, not only spread the enthusiasm and excitement through the students, but also modify and strengthen their internal image of themselves.
However, teachers should be very cautious about the level of difficulty a task may have. Irrationally difficult tasks which surpass the capacity of a given student will be rather daunting and put an unbearable pressure on the student. Thus, he or she may lose the courage to encounter problems and feel as being useless and incapable. This will be a catastrophe and disrupt the future of a student.
For example, forcing a student to solve a set of high level maths problems is destructive, since the student cannot do the task and may feel as being not enough clever and capable of overcoming a difficult situation, without depending on the helps of a grown-up individual.
On the whole, teachers should put students in accurately designed and well contoroled challenging situations to help them improve their capacity, find out their talents, and make a favorable image of their capabilities and intellectual faculties.
- Integrated writing 90
- You are planning to study abroad. What do you think you will like and dislike about this experience? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 97
- SOP for PhD of Oral Biology 97
- Teachers are responsible for motivating students Agree or disagree 70
- Some People like Doing Work By Hand. Others Prefer Using Machines. Which Do You Prefer? Use Specific Reasons And Examples To Support Your Answer. 80
Comments
It seems that I lose some
It seems that I lose some points. I expected a 26 but it is 24. would you please hint to the problems with the essay?
We had the doubt too. The
We had the doubt too. The E-rater gave a very low mark for this essay. We give the essay mark around 26-27.
But after we mix the para 3 to para 2, and mix para 5 to para 4, and tested it again, the E-rater gave 26. That's right. The reason is that you put two examples as new paragraphs, however, E-rater couldn't figure them out.
We realized you like to put small paragraphs for different ideas or examples, that is not a good idea. It is better to put one idea into one paragraph and focus on it with examples to get higher marks.
In real test, the final mark = (E-rater mark + human grader mark)/2, so you should be very careful.
You have same issues for GMAT essays. You may change the writing style in the future essay writings.
Sentence: On the whole, teachers should put students in accurately designed and well contoroled challenging situations to help them improve their capacity, find out their talents, and make a favorable image of their capabilities and intellectual faculties.
Error: contoroled Suggestion: controlled
flaws:
No. of Words: 311 350
No. of Different Words: 169 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 311 350
No. of Characters: 1704 1500
No. of Different Words: 169 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.199 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.479 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.243 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 128 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 113 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 87 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 60 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.923 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.976 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.692 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.34 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.657 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5