In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
More convenience for human beings was the major aim in the invention of the car. Beside of all advantages of this invention, there are some drawbacks that make it feasible to observe fewer cars in the future. I will render my reasons as follows.
First of all, as a transportation engineer, I know that there is a correlation between the road capacity and the number of cars. Nowadays, the demand for cars is increasing but the road capacity is constant. Any of us has stuck in a traffic jam, gotten nervous, seen impatient drivers reaction, and wasted time and energy. Time costs as a gold and it is not sensible to waste it in a non profitable action. Therefore, when there is no suitable basis for infrastructure, supplying more cars in markets is not reasonable and just fill car factories pockets. In this situation, a cultural action is needed to persuade citizens using public transportation.
Secondly, conservation of fuel is an important responsibility on our shoulders for the next generation. Excavation needs too many costs, much time and energy. On the other hand, utilizing innovative methods like using the sun, hydric, and mechanical energies are not efficient until the next twenty years.
Thirdly, the most important drawback in using cars is pollution, whether air pollution or sound pollution. Contaminated air causes terrible disasters such as lung cancers and infants with disordered genetic. In addition, pollution from fuel burning can destroy valuable monuments which present our culture and civilisation. Moreover, sound pollution produces persistent headache. Health is a serious factor for human survival. Scientist's experiments illustrate that ancient people were healthier than us.
All in all, I hope in twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use because all of us gain from that. Decreasing air and sound pollution, illness, and fuel consuming are the results of using fewer cars.
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- TOEFL integrated writing: The sea otter 75
- Integrated writingIn an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials. Co 80
- communal online encyclopedias-integrated essay. 80
- TOEFL integrated writing: Chevalier de Seingalt 80
Sentence: In addition, pollution from fuel burning can destroy valuable monuments which present our culture and civilisation.
Error: civilisation Suggestion: civilization
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.399 7.5
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 310 350
No. of Characters: 1561 1500
No. of Different Words: 187 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.196 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.035 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.836 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 113 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 92 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 68 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.399 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.45 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.267 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.51 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.072 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5