TPO 16 - Question 4Social LoafingWhen people work in groups to perform a task, individual group members may feel less motivated to contribute, since no one person is held directly responsible for completing the task. The result is that people may not work

Speaking topics in text

TPO 16 - Question 4
Social Loafing
When people work in groups to perform a task, individual group members may feel less motivated to contribute, since no one person is held directly responsible for completing the task. The result is that people may not work as hard, or accomplish as much, as they would if they were working alone and their individual output were being measured. This decrease in personal effort, especially on a simple group task, is known as social loafing. While it is not a deliberate behavior, the consequence of social loafing is less personal efficiency when working in groups than when working on one's own.

Speaking recording
Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This speaking topic by users
Post dates Users rates Contents
2016-12-26 mgrajapt 71.50 Check this speaking
2016-08-28 mgrajapt Check this speaking
2017-04-24 mgrajapt 80.00 Check this speaking
2019-12-27 Bobby1987 66.00 Check this speaking
2018-10-12 pashmina hira 50.00 Check this speaking
Speaking category
Speakings by user Bobby1987 :

Comments

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 750.0 592.248995984 127% => OK
No of words: 192.0 155.574297189 123% => OK
Chars per words: 3.90625 3.80514564318 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.525876923 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.0895480223 1.79077849142 117% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 93.7148594378 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.604071249207 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Syllable count: 235.8 185.844578313 127% => OK
Avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.19417670683 100% => OK

Performance on coherence:
Topic speech coherence ratio: 0.206480125238 0.0650381309087 317% => Good job. The more, the better.

Acoustic performance on paragraphs:
How many acoustic paragraphs: 2.0 4.35341365462 46% => OK
Average paragraph length: 96.0 68.503853103 140% => OK
STD paragraph length: 42.0 21.3332995233 197% => OK
Average paragraph duration: 30.265 25.9943957902 116% => OK
STD paragraph duration: 13.935 7.84667146824 178% => OK

Acoustic performance on sentences:
How many acoustic sentences: 34.0 42.0642570281 81% => OK
Average acoustic sentence length: 5.64705882353 4.02192344571 140% => OK
STD acoustic sentence length: 4.67711797221 3.1217529195 150% => OK
Average acoustic sentences duration: 1.72705882353 1.45093177766 119% => OK
STD acoustic sentences duration: 1.22133612806 0.99851816184 122% => OK

Acoustic performance on acoustic silence:(An acoustic silence means a little pause between two or more words)
How many acoustic silence: 37.0 39.0421686747 95% => OK
Total acoustic silence duration: 7.11 7.12997991968 100% => OK
Average acoustic silence duration: 0.192162162162 0.185688545393 103% => OK
STD acoustic silence duration: 0.137036888605 0.155154303396 88% => OK

Acoustic performance on acoustic words:
Total word duration: 50.19 47.1480722892 106% => OK
Average word duration: 0.26140625 0.305395592593 86% => OK
STD word duration: 0.148984764191 0.189427763521 79% => OK

Disfluencies: like hesitations, or 'ehn' or taking a long time to pronounce a word:
How many disfluencies: 7.0 7.94979919679 88% => OK
Total_disfluencies_duration: 5.17 6.2937751004 82% => OK
Total acoustic noise duration: 0.91 3.39508032129 27% => Good job. The lower, the better.

Acoustic rates:
Total speech duration: 60.53 59.7592369478 101% => Need to finish the speech on time.
Compare to expected duration: 1.00883333333 0.995987282463 101% => OK
Rate of silence: 0.611267140261 0.656000678711 93% => OK
Rate of speech: 3.17198083595 2.60215298798 122% => OK
Rate of speech by unique words: 1.6851148191 1.56821927147 107% => OK
Rate of word duration by unique words: 2.03227734608 1.99336655568 102% => OK
Average articulation rates: 0.441582640625 0.317803793328 139% => OK

---------------------
It may have duplicated content. Need to use the words more efficiently.

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by speech e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the speech e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas.