The diagrams below show the development of the horse
The picture illustrates how horse develops over 40 million years.
In general, the evalution consists of four stages, begining with Eohippus and ending with te modern horse. It is clear that, horse becomes larger and has a significant change in foot structure.
40 million years ago, the first breed of horse was called Eohippus having a small apperance and short tail. Its foot had 4 digits which is quite small. After 10 million years, this horse became larger, known as Mesohippus, with development in tail and forelock. The structure of its foot reduced in number of digits, by 1 digit.
In the next 15 years, the size of Merrychippus remained unchange compared to the previous one while the forelock continue grew. The foot still had 3 digits but bigger, especially the middle digit was extremely larger and longer than the others. At the final stage of the evolution, there is modern horse. It is bigger than its predecessors, with a dense forelock and single-foot structure - a very large digit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- The plan shows the design of a community centre 10 years ago and now 11
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 67
- The given picture shows the process of making electricity from coal Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagrams illustrate the process of building an igloo 56
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95857988166 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59597772448 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656804733728 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2209303817 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.1818181818 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3636363636 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100177022427 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420972400438 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622548919763 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826065803586 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662410457887 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.