Some people say that all people should stay in full-time education until they are least 18 years old. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this contemporary life, education is higher and some people believed that people should study full-time when they are over 18 years old. This argument has some advantages but its potential coexist. Personally, education is important but people need to care other areas.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of people should stay in full-time education. First, government subsidies for higher education are believed to equalize study opportunities among young people adolescents regardless of their background family and people spend time for education is also the way that they can donate for society. This study support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall study rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferior, which promotes an egalitarian society. Second, people stay full-time education probably result in a higher supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run and they can become a successful person in the future. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits if people spend full-time education until they are at least eighteen years old. First, spend full-time education until eighteen years old would likely correspond with a tremendous financial and communication strain on a country. Generating no income from entertainment and advertising, companies could become over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that they would be less input to develop other important areas such as health care system and transport infrastructure. Second, people spend full-time education would tempt young people they feel tired and not academically decline or show no communication with other people and potentially wasting time that these young people could spent their time for suitable leisure paths. It, instead, would be a more education if the resources were focused and balance on their health and their favorite.
In conclusion, education is one of the important part but when people spend full-time education is not only have some problems on themselves but also disadvantages in society. In my perspective, people need to have a plan to control about study and playing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-24 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- Some people think that art such as painting and music does not directly improve quality of people s life so government should spend money on other areas To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students should be encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views a 73
- The increasing use of computers and mobile phones has had a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills Agree Disagree 89
- The graph show the price of bananas in 4 different countries from 1996 to 2004 67
- The table below gives information on consumer spending items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 788, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires base form of the verb: 'spend'.
Suggestion: spend
...ting time that these young people could spent their time for suitable leisure paths. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, at least, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52747252747 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92721037172 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527472527473 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1242161668 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.133333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2666666667 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386878020009 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14985078197 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116798736653 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262461575017 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591204347207 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.