The best way to procedure a happier society is to ensure that there are only smaller differences between the richest and the poorest member. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the past decade, happier society is the important things to development country. There are many people think that the best way to procedure happier society is reduce the differences between wealthy and un-wealthy people. For me, if country want do that they need to support many things for poorest people. Personally, this approach is definitely desirable but not necessary the one and only option.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of people believed that ensure only smaller differences can create happier society. First, government subsidies for living conditions are believed to equalize working and learning opportunities among people regardless of their family background. This financial support, presumably tends not only to the overall enrollment rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority, which promotes an egalitarian society. Second, reduce differences between poorest and richest people would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that happiness and equality human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problem would be far more significant benefits once procedure happier society and government need to support many things as money, housing,… First, give many thing for poorest people that can make a small differences with riches people would likely correspond with a tremendous strain on a country. Generating no income from products, fees or tuition, company and school could become over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, reduce small differences tends many young people including these who are not academically inclined or show no intersect in development country because they know government supporting thereby adding great burden for government and staff and wasting time that these young people could have spent their time for trying. It, instead, there would be less happier society viable option if the resources were focused on supporting poor families who make positive contributions and who try hard.
In conclusion, create an happier society could make people more comfortable and loving each others. However, disadvantages could outweigh for government burdens. In my opinion, country need to consider about the best way to make happier society in this modern life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- The maps below show the layout of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people believe that technology causes more problems for modern society than solve Do you agree or disagree 89
- The bar chart show the price production in four countries from 2005 to 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features relevant 67
- The chart below shows the type of transports young people in four countries prefer to use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
...est way to procedure happier society is reduce the differences between wealthy and un-...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,
...to support many things as money, housing,… First, give many thing for poorest peo...
^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'many things'.
Suggestion: many things
... things as money, housing,… First, give many thing for poorest people that can make a smal...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 23, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d who try hard. In conclusion, create an happier society could make people more ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63659793814 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82446359337 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559278350515 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.1667297149 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.6875 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196598992399 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722206236564 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710804500651 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138521549808 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567080900703 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.