Today, many people do not know their neighbors. What problem does this cause? What can be done about this?
In this day and age, it is believed that a lot of people are not acquainted with their neighbors. Several problems can arise from this and there are measures that can be implemented to foster stronger connections between neighbors.
There are many complications that come from not being in touch with neighbors. Firstly, one major problem is the lack of community spirit. When people isolate themselves from the people around them, it undermines social connections required to build a cohesive and friendly neighborhood. For instance, individuals might feel alienated or detached from local events, such as community announcements, leading to potential disagreements and misunderstandings. Secondly, a lack of interaction between neighbors can lead to missed opportunities for mutual support. In emergencies, such as natural disasters or accidents, neighbors who are not accustomed to one another might be less inclined to offer help, which could otherwise be life-saving. As a result, residents will be less cooperative in the event of situations that endanger the safety of the neighborhood.
To address these issues, many approaches can be taken to promote interaction among residents. To begin with, neighborhood events such as barbecues, anniversaries or even cleaning the block can be a great way for people to meet up and build relationships in a group setting. These not only strengthen bonds and connections in a natural and relaxed manner, but also provide a chance to reflect and brainstorm new ideas to improve community life. This can be especially effective in cases of emergencies when coordinations and understanding can play a crucial role in handling difficult situations. Moreover, creating shared spaces like community parks or gardens can encourage a sense of community. For example, the elderly can do daily exercise at the local park, which can be a great chance to converse with others and it also improves their physical and mental health. This gives the community a common objective that they can bond over and get to know each other individually on a personal level.
In conclusion, consequences from not having a relationship with neighbors could be a lack of community spirit and mutual support. Therefore, I am firmly convinced that organising neighborhood events and community-shared spaces can help address the problem.
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 92
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 78
- Today many people do not know their neighbors What problem does this cause What can be done about this 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...it. When people isolate themselves from the people around them, it undermines social connections requi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...y spirit and mutual support. Therefore, I am firmly convinced that organising nei...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1993.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41576086957 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22817737961 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2045609419 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.722222222 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246049324808 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078938677178 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051096436063 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160492070411 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622931702925 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...it. When people isolate themselves from the people around them, it undermines social connections requi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...y spirit and mutual support. Therefore, I am firmly convinced that organising nei...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1993.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41576086957 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22817737961 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2045609419 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.722222222 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246049324808 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078938677178 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051096436063 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160492070411 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622931702925 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.