Most high level jobs are done by men. Should governments encourage that a certain percentage of these jobs be reserved for women? What is your opinion?
The importance of governments should encourage and reserve some of the high level jobs for women was always a debatable topic. Many people agrees with this suggestion completely and argue that both men and women should be considered equally. In my opinion, I completely agree with the statement that women should be given equal opportunities as men. The following paragraphs would further elaborate why we have to treat equally and then will discuss benefit of boosting of women holding a high position in a job market.
Firstly, no man is superior to woman and no woman is superior to man. There are people who believe that women deserve as much chance to work and excel in their works as much as men do. But, even if we are living in fast growing world, there are also people exist who believe that a woman's role should be limited to taking care of children and that of house. Quality education is the first step towards women empowerment. We are the stage of development at which-women standing up for themselves is extremely requisite.
Secondly, when women hold high level-jobs, it is not only making the equality in work but also can get some advantages from that. In some points of view, women are more sensitive than men so it is profitable that they could make a reasonable decision in some case. Furthermore, if women hold high position in work or government, they will fight for women rights such as giving importance to female gender. For instance, world has seen many powerful and prominent leaders like Indira Gandhi, Clinton and many more. And all the mentioned leaders are an true example that an educated women is capable of achieving heights.
In conclusion, it is certain that some high level-jobs should be held by female gender because equality between men and women is increasingly concerned and it also helps work going smoothly and effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-27 | Karie Tseng | 77 | view |
| 2019-02-22 | neethujithin | 67 | view |
| 2018-10-11 | Alka | 85 | view |
| 2018-10-02 | hchandra | 65 | view |
| 2018-09-19 | Hari Sharma | 80 | view |
- parents play imp role in educating children as teachers Agree disagree 49
- Should marketing for consumer goods companies like clothing and food focus on reputation or on short term strategies like discount and special offers? Why? 77
- parents play imp role in educating children as teachers. Agree/disagree? 77
- Global warming 85
- ageing people good/bad? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...overnments should encourage and reserve some of the high level jobs for women was always a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 549, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...more. And all the mentioned leaders are an true example that an educated women is ...
^^
Line 5, column 582, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...rs are an true example that an educated women is capable of achieving heights. In ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 319.0 242.827586207 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8934169279 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62061840883 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583072100313 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6693332364 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.066666667 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312817576653 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103871746429 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979953314055 0.071462118173 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202497602398 0.151781067708 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105878466325 0.0609392437508 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.