Recently, the phenomenon of designing buildings and their corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of working environment is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the living environment can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, positive effects of design on life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the traditional design, as well as people's satisfaction, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the relationship between the building industry and the design process. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the life of people and the effects of bad design apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, working conditions might increase the consequences of an impressive building. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of negative outcomes of design could relate to this reality that the demerits of building materials pertain to ugly buildings. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of modern architectural design is correlated negatively with interior designers. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of modern constructions.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of environmental designs far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a negative experience of life prove the significance of workspace design, but also pinpoint interior design implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67028985507 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3005058869 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623188405797 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0153205163 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.416666667 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324047319394 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951653477175 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563916774594 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165120025357 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270927187805 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.